|
|
Post by mikewitek on Feb 17, 2010 14:20:22 GMT -5
It seems that some players on the list are scared to play or they don't deserve to be on it I'm not saying any names
|
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Feb 18, 2010 14:59:55 GMT -5
In this we agree. *john and chess2810 don't want to ruin their so called undefeated records. I have challenged both of them with no reply. I challenged sudden and was declined. Some of them it's all about record and their inflated ratings. Most of the good players on this site would beat them and that is why they don't accept our challenges.
|
|
Comet
Full Member
Bright Blessings
Posts: 237
|
Post by Comet on May 4, 2014 16:17:25 GMT -5
I prefer to play chess than to compete for places on scoreboards which can be held by such tactics as described in this thread. There are many people on this site who will cheerfully accept challenges, and provide for satisfying chess games. Since players' records are public, everybody can see the reasons why any player has the particular rating, or standing in the scoreboard. Everyone achieved their place through "legal" means, and if you decry their tactics, then why not just disregard those players and applaud those who have their high standings using techniques of which you approve?
As each game here on Stan's is between two consenting players, I would not complain about the games of other people where I am not involved--I say: let them have their fun!
|
|
