Blockhead
Full Member
En passant ...
Posts: 167
|
Post by Blockhead on May 6, 2006 8:38:08 GMT -5
Top 100 Lists: Subscribers Browsing around I came across the Top 100 Lists of those with most wins and those with the highest established ratings. I was both surprised and disappointed when I noticed the number of SNC players in the top 20 (of both listings!) who have not yet subscribed to SNC. Clearly these are all long standing and well established players! I hope this generates some discussion, and that perhaps some of the players in the top 100 (subscribers and non subscribers alike!) will contribute. Before you go check this out at www.stansco.com/cgi-bin/nc_top100.cgi please take a guess as to what you think the number of non-subscribers in the top 20 might be!
|
|
|
Post by reyn on May 6, 2006 9:31:24 GMT -5
What's even more disappointing is the number of players that used to be subscribers and have let their subscriptions lapse and not renew.
I notice that the 'Highest Established Ratings' list has the most number of subscribers.
|
|
|
Post by yassen on May 7, 2006 6:12:53 GMT -5
What's even more disappointing is the number of players that used to be subscribers and have let their subscriptions lapse and not renew. I notice that the 'Highest Established Ratings' list has the most number of subscribers. If my maths is not wrong, 3 of the 4 top 100 lists have the same number of subscribers - 20%. In the "Best records" top 100 they are only 7, but this is less meaningful than the other 3 lists. I have not checked this before, or if I did I don't remember the numbers, so I can't say what is the trend. Still, 20% seems relatively low...
|
|