|
|
Post by Wookiee on May 5, 2006 10:10:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by yitwail on May 5, 2006 10:53:28 GMT -5
the move could be legal, if white first played a knight out, then black responded by playing the pawn up one square, and white then moved the knight back to its original square, except that the board's set up wrong: the lower right square for each player should be white, not black.
|
|
Gritty
New Member
Legend
Posts: 44
|
Post by Gritty on May 5, 2006 10:57:29 GMT -5
the move could be legal, if white first played a knight out, then black responded by playing the pawn up one square, and white then moved the knight back to its original square, except that the board's set up wrong: the lower right square for each player should be white, not black. True. That would be a remarkably generous opening from white though. |
|
|
|
Post by perseus on May 6, 2006 9:54:51 GMT -5
Don't be so negative:  |
|
beck15
Junior Member
Posts: 61
|
Post by beck15 on May 7, 2006 4:58:04 GMT -5
the board's set up wrong: the lower right square for each player should be white, not black. that's true.. now assuming that the board has been set up right, 1.Nf3/c3 e6 2.Ng1/b1 e5 -- results in the above position.. |
|
algae
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by algae on Mar 4, 2010 5:13:31 GMT -5
The other explanation is that white is playing with the black pieces ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by zingrillo on May 7, 2010 7:00:41 GMT -5
The position is wrong anyway... look at Kings and Queens...
...
|
|
Comet
Full Member
Bright Blessings
Posts: 237
|
Post by Comet on May 4, 2014 15:43:36 GMT -5
 I agree with algae. If black is white and white is black, both for the board and the pieces, then the picture indicates that the opening move is d4. |
|
