savin
Full Member
Posts: 233
|
Post by savin on Apr 7, 2006 11:25:39 GMT -5
Reyn,
Below is a list of players who meet the following conditions:
1) They have moved at the site in the last 2 weeks 2) They have played games against provisional players 3) We have only looked at games started in the last 6 months that have already finished 4) We have only shown the top-40 players from the point of view of most games meeting 3) above 5) We have considered a player as "provisional" based on the new rating system.
davedar49 124 Lorenzo 116 StampCollector 80 wayne6gambino 62 Flame of the West 62 MnA Bui 60 *uncle-dummy* 59 Ceaser911 55 Reyn 55 jlfvideo 54 Stubb 52 cootsfoot 48 Gant52 47 The Ancient Brit 42 knightmonger 42 its me matty d 40 baba oriley 40 Lieven 39 diabeditor 37 Chezbuzz 34 donaldlpn 33 BellesBabe 31 Wookiee 30 Ivanovich Gotland 30 black turtle 30 SECORTHEGREAT 29 Floyd 29 Michael122 29 ArwenEvenstar 27 Muskrat 27 ALSKI 11 26 Sdr46 24 JokernTP 24 stormcrow316 23 Ice Pack 23 CJC 22 KingKong 22 Georg 21 Kasper 21
|
|
|
Post by reyn on Apr 7, 2006 12:15:16 GMT -5
Thank you very much for that, Savin. Yes, that is helpful to me.
Is it possible that this report be made accessible on a monthly basis, in one form or another? Even if it was a subscriber-only report.
|
|
|
Post by reyn on Apr 10, 2006 13:48:10 GMT -5
Can this become available on a regular basis?
|
|
savin
Full Member
Posts: 233
|
Post by savin on Apr 10, 2006 14:05:59 GMT -5
Reyn,
Yes its possible to make this available --- but we would need to do it a different way to kae it automatic. I did this as a one-off. So the first thing to decide is what do you really want..
My thought is that you would want the following:
1) For all active established players 2) Who have current games against provisional players 3) Produce a list of the top 50 players ranked from high to low based on the number of active games them have against provisional players
Would this be correct? e need to get this right because Stan will need to build an extract file for this. It will be updated once a week with the ratings.
|
|
|
Post by Diet_Coke is better than chess on Apr 10, 2006 19:44:30 GMT -5
When was the last time I played a provisional player?
It seems so long ago.
|
|
|
Post by reyn on Apr 10, 2006 19:51:07 GMT -5
Reyn, Yes its possible to make this available --- but we would need to do it a different way to kae it automatic. I did this as a one-off. So the first thing to decide is what do you really want.. My thought is that you would want the following: 1) For all active established players 2) Who have current games against provisional players 3) Produce a list of the top 50 players ranked from high to low based on the number of active games them have against provisional players Would this be correct? e need to get this right because Stan will need to build an extract file for this. It will be updated once a week with the ratings. Ideally: 1) Yes 2) The established player need not necessarily be playing any current games against unrated /provisional players, but they should definitely be active. 3) The top 50 sounds fine. Again, the games don't have to be current, but the established player must be. Will the above work okay? I suppose you could add an additional column for those active established players who have current games against provisional players, but this, to me, is not so important. If there's a problem with the above, just let me know.
|
|
|
Post by reyn on Apr 13, 2006 14:20:24 GMT -5
Savin / Stan, is the above okay to go ahead with this?
|
|
savin
Full Member
Posts: 233
|
Post by savin on Apr 13, 2006 14:30:22 GMT -5
Reyn,
I think the report would be a bit more useful if its based on a more current view of the player. In addition, we don't really have any stats on the status of the player when the game was started, just their current status. How about this:
1) Only for active established players 2) Shows the number of games the player has active against players who are still provisional 3) Shows the number of games completed in the last 12 months against players who are still provisional.
|
|
|
Post by reyn on Apr 15, 2006 9:09:36 GMT -5
Reyn, I think the report would be a bit more useful if its based on a more current view of the player. In addition, we don't really have any stats on the status of the player when the game was started, just their current status. How about this: 1) Only for active established players 2) Shows the number of games the player has active against players who are still provisional 3) Shows the number of games completed in the last 12 months against players who are still provisional. Sure, okay, let's go with that form then. Thanks again, Savin.
|
|
|
Post by reyn on Apr 17, 2006 11:49:28 GMT -5
Savin / Stan, Can we go with the above form of this report? Please confirm.
|
|
savin
Full Member
Posts: 233
|
Post by savin on Apr 17, 2006 12:09:38 GMT -5
Reyn,
There are two steps to this. First is Stan's needs to build an extract file program. We then need to connect it to the new rating system (so that it gets created).
This means the report will get updated once per week.
Then I need to design the report. I will probably use one of the new summary reports as a basis.
Savin
|
|
|
Post by reyn on Apr 17, 2006 12:47:37 GMT -5
Great! Thanks for both of your efforts. It's appreciated.
|
|