|
|
Post by scarecrow on Aug 10, 2006 22:29:56 GMT -5
Thanks, I took the vacation post as my answer and saw the update. When I posted I was not sure if it was an automatic routine that was stuck or if someone had to run the routine and was on vacation.
|
|
|
|
Post by perseus on Aug 25, 2006 7:51:39 GMT -5
The ratings are very useful. And accurate, e.g. somebody rated 200 above, one in four games, 400 one in ten games (not that I have ever defeated anybody that high).
The only snag is if you are playing somebody highly rated and you have already lost and they forfeit, your rating is higher than it ought to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by biffhero on Oct 28, 2006 11:52:18 GMT -5
Ping!
Will the NRS become the main RS?
|
|
|
|
Post by Stan Steliga on Oct 28, 2006 13:58:55 GMT -5
Unfortunately, my personal life has kept me from doing more than the normal daily maintenance at the site. I have not had any time to work on the programming of the site.
I don't know when I'll be able to complete the new rating system.
|
|
Comet
Full Member
Bright Blessings
Posts: 237
|
Post by Comet on Apr 30, 2014 19:41:03 GMT -5
I hope your personal life allows you time to please refresh the existing NRS reports, even as you may not have time to perform the full replacement of the old (current) rating system.
The new rating system seems much more representative of real-world playing strength, and I find them very useful.
|
|
